Philip R. Lane: A middle path for ECB monetary policy
Speech by Philip R. Lane, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at
the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE)Washington,
D. C. , 5 February 2025
It is a pleasure to be here at the
Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE): your impressive
research on a wide range of topics is extremely valuable for
policymakers. [1]
At last week’s monetary policy meeting, the
ECB’s Governing Council decided to lower the deposit facility rate –
the rate through which we steer the monetary policy stance – by 25
basis points from 3. 0 per cent to 2. 75 per cent. In cumulative
terms, the deposit facility rate has declined by 125 basis points
since last June. The decision reflected our updated assessment of the
inflation outlook, the dynamics of underlying inflation and the
strength of monetary policy transmission.
In what follows, I
will explain in more detail the basis for this decision. I will review
inflation developments, economic developments, our risk assessment,
and financial and monetary conditions. Finally, I explain why pursuing
a middle path for monetary policy is best suited to the current
environment. Inflation developments
The disinflation process
remains well on track. Inflation has continued to develop broadly in
line with the staff projections and is set to return to our two per
cent medium-term target in the course of this year. Most measures of
underlying inflation suggest that inflation will settle at around our
target on a sustained basis. The Persistent and Common Component of
Inflation (PCCI), which has the best predictive power among underlying
inflation indicators for future headline inflation, continued to hover
around two per cent in the December data, indicating that headline
inflation is set to stabilise around our target.
Domestic
inflation, at 4. 2 per cent, stayed well above all the other
indicators in December mostly because wages and prices in certain
sectors are still adjusting to the past inflation surge with a
substantial delay. However, the PCCI for services, which should act as
an underlying attractor for services inflation and domestic inflation,
fell to 2. 3 per cent.
The anticipation of a downward shift in
services inflation in the coming months also relates to the expected
deceleration in wage growth in the course of 2025. Wages have been
adjusting to the past inflation surges with a substantial delay, but
the ECB wage tracker and the latest surveys point to a significant
moderation in wage pressures this year. According to the latest
results of the Survey on the Access to Finance of Enterprises (SAFE),
firms expect wages to grow by 3. 3 per cent on average over the next
twelve months, down from 4. 5 per cent this time last year. Similarly,
the latest Corporate Telephone Survey indicates that wage growth
should decelerate from 4. 3 per cent in 2024 to 3. 6 per cent in 2025
and 2. 7 per cent in 2026. This assessment is shared broadly among
forecasters. Consensus Economics, for example, foresees a decline in
wage growth by about one percentage point between 2024 and 2025.
Most measures of longer-term inflation expectations continue
to stand at around two per cent, despite an uptick at shorter horizons
that may reflect the recent rise in energy prices. While the inflation
expectations of firms have stabilised at three per cent across
horizons, according to the SAFE, larger firms that are aware of the
ECB’s inflation target show convergence towards two per cent. Consumer
inflation expectations have edged up recently, especially for the near
term, which can at least be partly explained by their higher
sensitivity to the recent uptick in realised inflation. Inflation
expectations of professionals – as captured by the latest vintages of
the Survey of Professional Forecasters and Survey of Monetary Analysts
– as well as market-based measures of inflation compensation have
ticked up for the near term but, over longer horizons, remain stable
at levels consistent with our medium-term target of two per cent.
Economic developments
On a fourth-quarter-to-fourth-quarter
basis, the 2024 growth rate came in at 0. 9 per cent, constituting a
material improvement in momentum relative to the 2023 growth rate of
0. 1 per cent. While 2024 saw a modest recovery in consumption,
investment remained weak and exporters continued to suffer
competitiveness challenges. In terms of the quarterly profile, growth
stagnated in the final quarter following a comparatively robust third
quarter.
The incoming survey indicators suggest that the euro
area economy is set to remain subdued in the near term. While
unemployment remained low at 6. 3 per cent in December, there has been
some softening in labour demand, as reflected in lower vacancies and
lower employment growth.
At the same time, our baseline
assessment is that the conditions for a recovery remain in place.
Higher incomes, lower interest rates and stronger household balance
sheets should allow a faster pick-up in consumption. More affordable
credit should also boost housing and business investment over time.
Exports should also support the recovery as global demand rises,
although this is highly conditional on developments in international
trade policies. Financial and monetary conditions
Global and
euro area bond yields have increased significantly since our last
meeting. Amongst other factors, the spillover impact of the rise in US
and global longer-term rates has contributed to the steepening of the
euro area yield curve.
Our past interest rate cuts are
gradually making it less expensive for firms and households to borrow.
The cost of borrowing for firms has declined by 92 basis points and
mortgage rates have declined by 62 basis points since their peaks in
autumn 2023. However, the interest rates on existing corporate and
household loan books remain high, especially in real terms, with
pre-2022 debt still re-pricing at higher rates as fixation periods
expire.
In overall terms, financing conditions remain tight.
While credit is expanding, lending to firms and households remains
subdued relative to historical norms. Growth in bank lending to firms
rose to 1. 5 per cent in December. In part, the pick-up in December
reflects firms substituting market-based long-term financing for bank-
based borrowing amidst tightening market conditions and increasing
upcoming redemptions of long-term corporate bonds. Overall external
debt financing of firms increased by 1. 9 per cent in December, but
remained well below the historical average of 4. 9 per cent. [2] Loans
to households continued to rise gradually, driven by mortgages, but
remained muted overall, with an annual growth rate of 1. 1 per cent in
December, notably below the long-term average of 4. 2 per cent.
According to the latest bank lending survey, the demand for
loans by firms increased slightly in the fourth quarter. At the same
time, credit standards for loans to firms have tightened again, after
having broadly stabilised over the previous four quarters. The renewed
tightening of credit standards for firms was driven by the fact that
banks see higher risks to the economic outlook and have lower
tolerance for taking on credit risk. This finding is consistent with
the results from the SAFE, in which firms reported a small decline in
the availability of bank loans and more demanding non-rate lending
conditions. In terms of households, the demand for mortgages increased
strongly, mostly on the back of more attractive interest rates and
better prospects for the property market. Credit standards for housing
loans remained unchanged overall. Risk assessment
Risks to
economic growth remain tilted to the downside. In addition to trade
policy uncertainty, lower confidence could prevent consumption and
investment from recovering as fast as expected. This could be
amplified by geopolitical risks, such as Russia’s unjustified war
against Ukraine and the tragic conflict in the Middle East, which
could disrupt energy supplies and further weigh on global trade.
Growth could also be lower if the lagged effects of monetary policy
tightening last longer than expected. In the other direction, growth
could be higher if easier financing conditions and falling inflation
allow domestic consumption and investment to rebound faster.
We take a two-sided approach to assessing inflation risk.
Inflation could turn out higher if wages or profits increase by more
than expected. Upside risks to inflation also stem from the heightened
geopolitical tensions, which could push energy prices and freight
costs higher in the near term and disrupt global trade. Moreover,
extreme weather events, and the unfolding climate crisis more broadly,
could drive up food prices by more than expected. By contrast,
inflation may surprise on the downside if low confidence and concerns
about geopolitical events prevent consumption and investment from
recovering as fast as expected, if monetary policy dampens demand by
more than expected, or if the economic environment in the rest of the
world worsens unexpectedly. Greater friction in global trade would
make the euro area inflation outlook more uncertain. A middle path for
monetary policy
Taken together, the incoming data since our
previous meeting meant that it was clear that we should take a further
step in monetary easing by lowering the deposit facility rate to 2. 75
per cent. By excessively dampening demand, the alternative of holding
the deposit facility rate at the level of 3. 0 per cent would not have
been consistent with the set of rate paths that would best ensure that
inflation stabilises sustainably at our two per cent medium-term
target. At the same time, the new level for the deposit facility rate
at 2. 75 per cent preserves considerable optionality in responding to
shocks. In particular, the rate path can adjust as appropriate in the
event of material upside or downside shocks to the inflation outlook
and/or to economic momentum.
While our baseline is that
inflation should decline from 2. 5 per cent in January to around our
target in the coming months, it is still important to take into
account that this deceleration might take longer than expected and
that new upside risks to inflation could emerge, including due to
external developments. These considerations explain why we have taken
a step-by-step approach to rate cutting since last June.
At
the same time, an excessive abundance of caution in monetary easing
could threaten the recovery in domestic demand that is needed to
support the pricing environment compatible with our medium-term two
per cent target. Under this too-cautious path, a below-target
inflation dynamic could take hold, which would then require a more
sizeable policy response to ensure inflation returns to our symmetric
two per cent medium-term target.
Balancing these
considerations suggest a middle path is appropriate, which neither
over-weighs upside risk nor over-weighs downside risk. That is, a
robust monetary policy approach should balance the risks of moving too
slowly against the risks of moving too quickly. Accordingly, it is
prudent to maintain agility in adjusting the stance as appropriate on
a data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting basis and to not pre-commit to
any particular rate path.
In closing, let me comment on two
much-discussed concepts: restrictiveness and neutrality.
When
inflation is materially above target and requires a monetary response
to ensure that it returns to target in a timely manner and that
inflation expectations remain anchored, the monetary stance must be
clearly restrictive. As inflation returns close to target,
policymakers need to shift their focus to adjusting monetary policy in
line with the incoming economic and financial data and the evolving
risk assessment to deliver the two per cent target over the medium
term. In other words, policymakers should deliver the monetary stance
that is appropriate to the situation.
In exiting a restrictive
phase, much energy could be diverted towards creating a summary
“restrictiveness” index. Any such index would have to incorporate at
least nine factors: (i) the still-important rolling off of super-cheap
debt that was taken out in the “low for long” era that is now being
re-financed at higher rates; (ii) in the other direction, the
transmission of the easing since the peak of the hiking cycle; (iii)
the impact of the anticipation of future rate cuts on current
financing conditions; (iv) the evolving contribution of quasi-
exogenous influences on financing conditions (such as global upward
pressure on term premia); (v) the dynamics of bond and equity risk
premia; (vi) the evolution of credit standards in bank lending; (vii)
the different timelines for market-based and bank-based transmission;
(viii) the responsiveness of consumption and investment to shifting
monetary conditions; and (ix) the responsiveness of price setting to
shifting monetary conditions.
All of these factors enter our
calibration of monetary policy (our assessment of the strength of
monetary policy transmission has been highlighted as central to our
reaction function) and cannot be summarised by a single indicator such
as comparing the prevailing policy rate to a highly-uncertain estimate
of the so-called neutral rate. [3]
In terms of policy making,
uncertainty about the level of the neutral rate and, more generally,
about the strength of monetary transmission inescapably sits alongside
uncertainty about the inflation outlook and uncertainty about the
economic outlook.
This is why our 2021 monetary policy
strategy statement highlights that our decisions are based on an
integrated assessment of all relevant factors. Over the last two
years, we have emphasised in particular the importance of underlying
inflation and the strength of monetary transmission as particularly
relevant in complementing our analysis of the inflation outlook. More
generally, it is essential that all relevant risks are incorporated in
monetary policy decisions.